Buddhist Illusion
We met for lunch at a local cafe. H, was a retired gentleman who had lead a very successful life in the medical field. We had talked on a previous occasion and he was anxious to get into further discussions about "illusion" and my particular comments on the subject. He greeted me with a traditional Buddhist salutation. His wife was Japanese, he had converted to her faith of Zen many years ago, although he was proud to say that it was not a "religion" in the commonly understood sense.
He said in deep baritone voice that hinted at the authority of years of leadership, "So L, things are well with you and how is your business?" Its good to see you H, things are well and business is enjoyable. I smiled at him and shook his out stretched hand. "I have been doing some thinking since we last had our conversation about illusion and decided to read though some sutra's on the subject." "I must admit that I was some what taken aback at your comment about the essence of illusion as the formulation of all ones thought processes, that Buddhism its self is born of illusion." " To have a thought must be a necessary element in one's search for illumination, satori and enlightenment." "Still the sutra's beg the question, that one must come to a point of nothingness, but it seems that it must all begin with a thought." My response: Does the study of a religious text bring one to a point of understanding? Or have you just accumulated more in the way of knowledge that supports your illusion of knowing? The mind that is in illusion can only realize its content, which is the confirmation and continuation of its illusion. The mind that is clouded with the known, with all the teachings of all the sages through history, can never realize that which is beyond knowing. The truth of the moment is original, it has nothing to do with the repetitive nature of defined logic or for that matter with what appears to be the illogic of Zen or any other "Buddhist" methodology. If a person is at all serious, then all conceptual "beliefs" must be negated. One cannot escape illusion by simply defining its parameters and attempting to understand through a defined self, which is the progenitor of all illusion.
H looked at me with a perplexed expression on his face and said, "You mean I should just disregard all the sutra's, abandon my "Buddhist" beliefs?" I said, what do you think? Their was a long pause. He could not answer. I gestured with an outstretched hand and said, only you can answer that question. It depends on where you are at and how much you still rely on your conditioning. "You mean my conditioning as a Buddhist?" Isn't all conditioning relevant regardless of how we label it? "Yes, Yes you are right and just now I see something that I had not realized before." He smiled. I said, now do not conceptualize it and turn it into something to be sought again and again. The moment has passed, let it go. Allow each moment to be original, a rebirth.
"You know L, I really enjoy talking with you." "Its interesting to me, how you are so simple, yet behind that simplicity is this insight that pierces though self illusion." I chuckled and said, I am no different than you. I live with the same illusion. The only difference is that I am aware in the moment. The outcome of which is the realization of the true self, an awareness that is choiceless and timeless. "How will I explain this to my wife?" I said, Why explain? And if you did what would you explain? Just live the freedom of the absolute moment, which needs no explanation. We parted with a hug and the understanding that we would talk again.